“What about the fact that men can be feminist too? ”

And yet there are plenty of feminists that deny that a man can ever really be a feminist, ohnly and ally. And for those feminists that do allow the possibility of male feminists, these male feminists are always only allowed in on sufferance.

“I am a feminist and so is my brother, father, uncles…. I don’t think that that feminists ‘point the finger’ or blame anyone, well at least I don’t because that is very difficult to do”

You might want to look at feminism a little more extensively then. Feminism’s whole victim narrative blames men for oppressing women. Are you familiar with the Redstockings Manifesto, a seminal text for mainstream feminism? It’s full of finger-pointing and all aimed at men.
http://www.redstockings.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=59

But then we see the flip side and hear women cry and moan that there are no good men left. Oh, there are plenty of good men out there, but many have seen dads who have had their asses handed back to them in family law court. And seen how society praises mom for “going it alone” while mocking dad for wanting things like HIS freedom, and maybe a relationship in midlife. These young men are chastised for being video game playing, pornography addicted underachievers – but can we blame them? Their feminist mommies emasculated them with the help of a progressively more anti-male school system, and their dads were labelled as chumps and losers for having affairs after decades of sexless joyless marriages to ball-busting man hating witches.

Why on gods green earth would ANY young man want to marry ANY female on the planet? And when you add stats like these:
– 50% of people will get divorced
-75% of divorces are instigated by women
-If you’re lucky, you get the financial burden of divorce
-If she’s angry, and many are encouraged to be angry by feminists and other bitter divorced women, she’ll accuse you of abusing her and your own kids (physically and even sexually), and countless other lies that she won’t even have to substantiate in the least, at which point you’ll lose everything including your reputation, and you won’t get to see your own children. You can end up paying for children conceived out of wedlock that are not even yours, and you have to pay child support and also alimony even if she remarries a wealthy man and your contribution is neglible to them, but puts you in a position of financial ruin and poverty.

Ladies: you think you won. You won nothing. Feminism was based on hatred and lies and you bought into it because, well, you’re human and you’re greedy.

Young men: your reasons for not marrying are valid. Enjoy sex with women, and any companionship they offer. If they want to move in with you, say “In five years or so….okay?” or just move on to the next one.

They ALL SAY they love YOU and want to be with YOU when they want the ring and the house and the minivan and the 2.3 kids and the dog and the fish. And they all talk about “forever after” and “happily ever after” – and expect you to keep your vows even if they gain 200 pounds or turn into hormone-filled raging sexless psychopaths. If THEY, however, find any reason at all to not want to be married anymore, they can call it quits and you’re largely going to fund the operation. (That’s ‘equal’ according to feminists – men must pay for sins of patriarchies past I guess…).

So remember: As long as women do not tear down these anti-male laws, precedents and attitudes, they are part of the problem. They are reaping the benefits of real discrimination and inequality.

The next time women say there are “no good men anymore”, say “Whether there are is irrelevent, in the absence of marriable women.”

Maybe you should start doing some spring cleaning, so to speak, and speak out against the feminists that do. Like the ones who thought my hurt and trauma mattered not because I was a white-priveledged male and worse things happen to women and girls.

Slut-shaming as market share protection. I have been saying this for a long time.

“Of course, the fact that this contradicts their own rhetoric (of men determining women’s worth in proportion to their level of sexual availability) has apparently slipped right by most of ‘em.”

Being able to ignore the inconsistencies in your belief system is the mark of a truly blessed true believer.

SYABM, when I post our stuff to reddit, people love it.

From their incoherent response to slut shaming (they somehow seem to understand that it’s mostly something women do to each other, but somehow want blame men for it)

Generally, it’s done by linking the concept to the male oppression of women on a sexual sense (Rape Culture, etc.) that they Know exists. Of course, the fact that this contradicts their own rhetoric (of men determining women’s worth in proportion to their level of sexual availability) has apparently slipped right by most of ’em. Some say it’s part of some sort of complicated double-bind intended to maintain control of women, but that’s a level of Conspiracy Theory above and beyond even, well, most feminist theories.

Truth is, if a women is more available to men, that increases her sexual worth to men. Which makes it harder for other women to compel men to do things for them for the lure of sex. It’s not men trying to oppress women, it’s women trying to shut down a competitor.

The male equivalent of that is forcing boys (mostly) into sports for the father’s own ego reasons or similar self-serving ambitions for the child.