Hunger Strike


by Kursat Christoff Pekgoz

I understand that the hunger strike I have undertaken was rather eccentric. I’m a free man, not a prisoner. As a long-distance swimmer, I was already accustomed to irregular eating habits, although I had never attempted such a long fast before. I was under the supervision of a doctor throughout the strike, and I wanted to see how long I could endure the hunger until health complications begin. I avoided solid food for thirty-two days, and I stopped only after I was diagnosed with hyperbilirubinemia and after beginning to experience blurry vision. I took various liquids and vitamins throughout the strike, and I have lost seventeen pounds or so. I have recovered my health now, or so I hope, although I still suffer from bouts of nausea and I find it more difficult to focus on complex tasks now. 

I endured the hunger on behalf of a class of human beings who experience discrimination on a daily basis in various walks of life. The discrimination they experience can be shockingly inhumane, but the members of this class often suffer in silence. They live shorter lives due to higher rates of suicide and workplace deaths. They are more likely to die in warfare not only as combatants but also as civilians. They experience unapologetic and shocking discrimination in the criminal justice system, including in the administration of the death penalty. The family court system is biased against them—many lose their children and livelihood. The younger members of this class are now making less money than their counterparts. They are the overwhelming majority of prisoners and the majority of homeless people. Despite all this, the press rarely (if ever) condemns discrimination against the members of this class, even though such discrimination is unlawful as per Supreme Court doctrine. 

We commonly refer to this class of human beings as “men.” 

Towards the end of the hunger strike, just as I was beginning to develop blurry vision and at the very verge of my strength, I received word of success. The United States was opening an investigation against Yale University for discrimination against men. Below is an amended version of the manifesto that I sent to the Department of Education before beginning my hunger strike:

Discrimination against men begins at an early age. 77% of all teachers in the public education system are women.1 Girls have higher grades than boys in all categories.2 Numerous studies “have shown that stereotyping [by female teachers] can bias teachers’ assessment and grades” against boys.3 The “proportionality prong” of Title IX enforced by the Department of Education has steadily limited athletic opportunities for men, with young men receiving fewer and fewer resources each passing year.4 While selective enforcement on the basis of sex is illegal on paper, as per 34 CFR §106, boys routinely receive harsher discipline than girls for identical offences in every category.5

Women are now the overrepresented sex among college students nationwide. 6 They are also the majority of law students 7 and medical students. 8 Women comprise the majority of doctorate degrees in the health and medical (80%), biological (56%) and social/behavioral (63%) sciences nationally.9 New civil rights data published by the Department of Education makes it clear that concerns over the underrepresentation of women in STEM education are outdated.10 Women are at a 2 to 1 advantage over men in STEM faculty hiring.11 Almost every college offers a Women’s Studies Department 12, but no equivalent programs exist for men.13

According to institutions that release such data, the overwhelming majority of the persons sanctioned under Title IX are male.14 However, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and others, men and women experience sexual victimization at equivalent rates 15 and the majority of male victims report female perpetrators. 16 The majority of Title IX administrators nationwide are women. 17 The unfairness of Title IX tribunals has received widespread and bipartisan criticism.18-23. Male students/professors who deviate from the orthodoxy of campus gender politics often face mobbing or termination. There are many such examples, including cases covered by the press. 24-28

Things change. Our gender discourse, and our application of the law, is in sore need of getting with the times. The modern west is a very different place than it was when Title IX became federal law, and our courts, our media and most especially our universities need to start living in the here and now, rather than in an era that no longer exists. 


1. Liana, L. (2017). The Nation’s Teaching Force Is Still Mostly White and Female. Retrieved from  

2. Daniel, V. (2014). Girls Make Higher Grades than Boys in All School Subjects, Analysis Finds. Retrieved from 

3. Camille, T. (2016). Boys Lag Behind: How Teachers’ Gender Biases Affect Student Achievement, MIT Department of Economics and National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 1-3

4. Megan, S. (2001). Reverse Discrimination under Title IX: Do Men Have a Sporting Chance. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports L.J, Vol. 8, Issue 1, Article 7 Retrieved from

5. Wallace, J. M., Goodkind, S., Wallace, C. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2008). Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in School Discipline among U.S. High School Students: 1991-2005. The Negro educational review, 59(1-2), 47–62. Retrieved from

6. U.S. Depart. Of Education (2016). Bachelor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity and sex of student: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2014-15. Retrieved from  

7. Elizabeth, O. (2016). Woman Make Up Majority of U.S. Law Students for First Time. Retrieved from

8.  Michael, C. (2018). Woman are now a majority of entering medical students nationwide. Retrieved from

9.  Mark, P. (2018) Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2017 for 9th straight year and outnumber men in grad school 137 to 100. Retrieved from 

10. Press Office. (2018). U.S. Department of Education Releases 2015-16 Civil Rights Data Collection. Retrieved from

11. Williams, W. M. & Ceci, S. J. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. p. 112, 5360–5365 (2015). 

12. Data USA. (2016). DATAUSA: Woman’s Studies. Retrieved from 

13. John, D. (2019) GenderStudiesForMen home page [Facebook Page]. Retrieved from

14. Jersis, D.(2018). Stanford University’s 2018 Title IX Report. Retrieved from

     (2018) Yale University’s 2018 Title IX Report. Retrieved from

15. Stemple, L., & Meyer, I. H. (2014). The sexual victimization of men in America: new data challenge old assumptions. American journal of public health104(6), e19–e26. Retrieved from 

16. Lara, S., Andrew, F., Ilan, M. (2017). Sexual Victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, Elsevier. Retrieved from

17. Peter, W.(2013).  Gender Inequity Among The Gender Equity Enforcers. Retrieved from

18. Elizabeth, B., Nancy, G., Janet, H.,Jeannie, G. (2017). Fairness For All Students Under Title IX. Retrieved from 

19. Bobby, S. (2018). Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thinks Some College Title IX Trials Are Unfair to the Accused. Retrieved from

20. The Editorial Board. (2017). Jerry Brown’s Title IX Veto. Retrieved from

21. Multiple Authors. (2018). Open Letter Regarding Inequitable Victim-Centered Practices. Retrieved from

22. Bradford, R. (2016). Law professors pen open letter denouncing Title IX overreach. Retrieved from

23. NAS. (2017). NAS Applaids Secretary Devos’s Decision On Title IX. Retrieved from 

24. Caleb, P. (2018). College student kicked out of class for telling professor there are only two genders. Retrieved from 

25. Andrew, L. (2018). Pro-free speech professor Rick Mehta fired by Acadia Univserisy. Retrieved by 

26. John, B. (2018). Catholic University suspends dean over comment that ‘degraded’ kavanaugh accuser. Retrieved from  

27. Toni, A. (2018). Students Demand Professor Be Fired After He Champions Due Process, Says ‘Accusers Sometimes Lie’. Retrieved from 

28. James, V. (2019). Portland State Univ. professor to face discipline for exposing shoddy scholarship. Retrieved from


Kursat Christoff Pekgoz is a Title IX activist fighting for equal rights in American academia. He has filed a series of complaints against various institutions, including USC and Yale and Princeton, which were accepted for investigation by the Department of Education. He tries to help other men combat gender discrimination in his spare time. He also has a proud record for defending the civil rights of ethnic and religious minorities against the tyranny of Islamic fundamentalists. He is doing his best to continue his politically incorrect advocacy despite various forms of smear and retaliation.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestmailby feather

Listen to Honey Badger Radio!

Support Alison, Brian and Hannah creating HBR Content!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments





Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssyoutubeby feather